20161010-1815. Off-topic rant only: Anyway, when I first heard the VERY unclear audio many slong years ago, my first impression was without emotion. And with the rough transcript coupled with the laughter, my honest opinion indicated that she was laughing at the ‘lie detector’ test methodology.
I’ve read somewhere years ago that there is a way too fudge the results. But I’m not gonna post that simple technique in my blog post here.
So, I’m NOT understanding what y’all are attempting to prove by reminding us old data.
Hillary is defender and that’s a difficult, especially if the client is evil. Whereas I’m a prosecutor and have a difficult time proving evil when ALL belongs to God. Sheesh.
Leave a Reply