This is my failed and brutal attempt to make sense of this Qanon stuff.
- Ask yourself a very simple, logical, question. Okay, I’ll try my best. But like I said, I’ll be busy as a cubicle slave with hemorrhoids and won’t be able to blog my rants online, because like any model, I cannot sustain this life or lifestyle without being a slave.
- What is a FISA warrant/application?
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Court
- https://www.uscourts.gov/forms/law-enforcement-grand-jury-and-prosecution-forms/application-search-warrant
- I’ve downloaded an AO 106 (Rev. 04/10) Application for a Search Warrant.
- I’m am learning and educating myself and I see stuff:
- In The Matter of the Search of (Briefly describe the property to be searched or identify the person by name and address)
- I, a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government, request a search warrant and state under penalty of perjury that i have reason to believe that on the following person or property (identify the person or describe the property to be searched and give its location): located in the [blank] District of [blank], there is now concealed (identify the person or describe the property to be seized):
- The basis for the search under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(c) is (check one or more):
- evidence of a crime;
- contraband, fruits of crime, or other items illegally possessed;
- property designed for use, intended for use, or used in committing a crime;
- a person to be arrested or a person who is unlawfully restrained.
- The search is related to a violation of: Code Section and Offense Description
- The application is based on these facts.
- Continued on the attached sheet.
- Delayed notice of [blank]days (give exact ending date if more than 30 days: [blank] ) is requested under 18 U.S.C. 3103a, the basis of which is set forth on the attached sheet.
- I see that stuff can be either person or property and NOT both. Hmm.
- 20190303-1224-aside thought: That the guns can be grabbed and NOT the person. Hehe. That’s bad.
- 20190303-1228-aside thought: The application is based on these FACTS. So basically y’all need evidence.
- Is it a highly confidential [safeguarded] product of the UNITED STATES GOV?
- See, I’m into science fiction and I like that documentations are recording stuff due to the fact that anyone can fudge documents and numbers.
- So, I would safeguard the stuff. But we still need transparency and safeguarded tools for full disclosures, in case ET phone home and pals decide to atomize your stuff.
- If a product of the US GOV _ how did UK/AUS know what was listed inside of the package?
- If y’all believe that the US Constitution is null and void, that USA has been handed over to the wealthy control freaks, and that USA is an American Corporation and an off-shoot Babylonia daughter of the Crown (UK), then the Five Eyeballs, especially UK and AUS, can see the stuff, because their ‘leaders’ are Prime Ministers and their parliamentary pals are on board this ship. So technically, y’all are ruled by a ‘King’.
- Think call to POTUS to prevent DECLAS [sources & methods].
- Blackmail using propaganda regarding complicit participation with the pedophile rings and transgender support. (I’m view YouTube videos found my Recommended list on this gross stuff.)
- If the US GOV requests UK/AUS [+2] to spy [+ campaign insertion] on an AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRE_NOMINEE + POTUS ELECT, is there a CHAIN OF COMMAND to APPROVE such AUTH?
- In any ‘business’ matter, I would believe that there are tentacles with bosses who have appropriate channels to file this application.
- There first has to be a complainer, whiner, or group who wants to file an application of this sort to address their areas of concerns.
- Paper trail of the CHAIN OF COMMAND & umbrella spy metadata?
- In any documentations, paper AND electronic trails would help to support the complainer, whiner or group filing an application.
- If not tasked & targeted under FVEY – what legal authority existed to engage the targeting?
- That depends on the chain of command and other supporting stuff.
- Think Nunes’ statement “not through normal collection, gathering, and reporting/oversight re: (FVEY).”
- That is the process of ‘discovery’ though the due course of activities are NOT normal. I guess y’all will have to do whatever it takes to ensure that stuff is good.
- Did the dossier provide the ‘bulk data’ anchor for the spy campaign?
- Ugh, nope. Once again, anyone can co-create narratives to suit an agenda, cause, or movement.
- What entity paid for the ‘research’ dossier?
- I would image anyone with wealth – starting with the Crown King.
- Opposition candidate?
- They are included as any payment receive implied or not was intended for such activities.
- What US Ally completed the collection of false data?
- That’s where y’all gonna have to do whatever it takes to find out – Spy Versus Spy.
- Why was it important to use sources within the UK vs. US?
- Because they are part of the propaganda.
- How do you circumvent US LAW?
- Y’all are gonna have to ask the Crown King and pals, because money seems to own y’all.
- What other ‘anchors’ were provided to FISC in order to gain the warrant? [DECLAS will show].
- Someone who will NOT cave, I guess.
- Was the ‘other’ data (collection/process) worse than the dossier?
- Whichever way y’all decide to produce a successful propaganda, go with that one.
- Why didn’t FISC require ‘in room’ presentations of the data prior to ‘sign off’?
- Because it is probably a fudged deal?
- Who signed apps 1-4?
- An operative?
- Who traveled to UK/AUS post election of POTUS?
- More operatives?
- Why were SECURITY PRIV removed from select ‘formerly active’ individuals?
- That’s to protect them from eye witness tampering?
- Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the highest levels of GOV (WW).
- Okay, whatever. Bring down the hammer, if y’all can.
- How do you repair a bridge without closing it down?
- Y’all re-route the detour to safer path.
- Q
Leave a Reply