After hearing Cain prefer growth, I barely profited from stocks with “growth”. However, I feel value in companies is a better option. For example, if the older companies have brought the essentials as far as business models, platforms and other NON-tangible assets, that’s valuable to me than growth in outmoded scientific and medical technology.
Further my idea in research and development could be considered a “value” in asset as far as innovation, such as my hovercraft for ambulatory/emergency/military vehicles. I would invest in education via NASA and other institutions at the grassroots level.
I may add more on this topic. But I am still listening to the Republican Presidential Debate.
Addendum: Growth is good only if there is value. Have you ever heard of over growth? Those must be trimmed to be of value. “Too big to fail” is such an example where value has been lost to default and bankruptcy. And the bailout of banks was a mistake.
Posted from WordPress for Android
Leave a Reply