Share: WBO to review Pacquiao-Bradley decision; Nevada attorney general might follow suit
“In boxing, however, there is no such simple mechanism to prove a bad call – or a perceived bad call…”
“Boxing is perhaps the most subjective sport to judge.”
Maw and I were NOT really interested in watching a VIOLENT sport, such as boxing. We certainly did NOT care to watch this paid event, which Paw rented and enjoyed. He was hoping for the underdog to loose. But uncannily Paw always seem to loose!
There is NOTHING entertaining about watching two grown men hurting each other for the love of money, err, the sport of boxing. It’s an old programming of gladiators suffering to win the admiration of a blood-thirsty crowd, much like football fans.
Don’t people remember how innocent people were sacrificed because of religious beliefs and yet the paying audience cheered on the winners for killing the losers? I wonder why boxing cannot be banned soon like football? Surely, people should be aware of the extent of injury and potential death associated with such violence upon a person.
With regards to the complaints, why would you let the angry mob of mindless sport fans get what they want? Aren’t they happy a BLACK man won over a Satanic sell-out? (Notice how Pacquiao keeps flashing those damn horns with his fingers. That’s NOT Christian! Wake up, sheeple!)
I wouldn’t get politics, much like separating church from state, involved with business of taking away a sur-prize already handed out to someone who worked so damn hard to earn it. After all, both Reid and Pacquiao are politicians and that wouldn’t be fair to the winner. Get it?
Leave a Reply