This is my futile and bored attempt to make sense of this Q stuff.
- What happened to the Mueller hype?
- I have NOT been following what is going on with the hype and I am waiting for the time when the full public disclosure would be effected.
- 20190221-2151: My guess is that the narrative has changed for the positive.
- 20190221-2256: I’m actually picking up something NOT worth mentioning, almost like everything was a waste of time.
- What happened to the Mueller will take down POTUS threats [@JohnBrennan]
- Traitor? I do NOT know exactly who he is or what he does. Wait!
- 20190221-2323: Is Former CIA Director John Brennan a Muslim?
- Was MUELLER the ‘insurance’ policy aka BLOCKADE designed to limit/restrict POTUS’ ability to enforce the law?
- I am NOT understanding how this works.
- 20190221-2257: Oh, I see. You mean, like a delay tactic? Yeah, that’s plausible. (See? I’m learning to type words that flow yet do NOT know the exact word definition to – yet another preposition. Sheet!)
- [TRAITORS]
- Please conclude this stuff and clean house.
- I noticed that the energy is reflected in recent weathers of sunshine, fluffy puffy clouds of white against crispy clear blue skies, and today’s freezing STRONG winds.
- New talking points being pushed backing away from Mueller as the savior re: excuse A, excuse B, excuse C?
- 20190221-2255: From what I read about the guy, he seems good at what he does. His convictions will help to iron out this debacle, and hopefully that would give three more narratives to choose from and more delay tactics – “oh the guys got stuck [again]” – sort of deal. I know, because it works VERY well to frustrate getting ANYTHING settled.
- 20190221-2300: Y’all are triggering my memory cells, especially the ones, that will NEVER forget! Liars!
- Why are *new* investigations by [AS] being started, if, as he’s stated for almost (2) years, ‘evidence’ exists that ties POTUS to Russia?
- Oh, now, y’all never seem to get enough of trying to waste taxpayers monies! In all honesty, if y’all really have anything, then that price probably has already been paid via his multiple clones and drones. (That was weird, but I’m picking up somethings had to be given up to get into this sort of mess-20190221-2253.)
- 20190221-2254: Then again I’m sensing something about nuclear and cocaine to Russia to Syria to Iraq – etc; and something about rings. Brouhaha!
- If they had evidence, do you think it would have leaked?
- 1. Yes. 2. No, if there is serious evidence, then that stuff should NOT have leaked. (I am finally trying to understand the humanized word ‘serious’ per my pamphlet on what is domestic violence and other crimes of severity that would warrant calling the cops and whatnots.)
- If they had evidence, would they be backing away (playing down) the Mueller report about to be released?
- 20190221-2234: They should be backing away/playing down the stuff due two major players involved.
- First they pushed for a SC.
- Hey, great! See? That’s how y’all create jobs that no one wants or how to do!
- Now they claim the SC didn’t look deep enough?
- Yeah, that is because there are BLOCKAGES.
- IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED – HOW DO THEY KNOW WHERE, WHO, WHEN, WHY, AND HOW DEEP EACH CASE …………..?
- Y’all have to order a nice subpoena? (This is a word that I do NOT entirely understand.)
- IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED – HOW DO THEY KNOW THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE REPORT?
- Y’all have to order a nice subpoena? (This is a word that I do NOT entirely understand.)
- Are *new* investigations designed to be an ‘insurance’ extension?
- 20190221-2302: Yup, as I’ve said earlier, these ‘delays’ and ‘snags’ only frustrates the brownish sheets outta my panties! (I’m sorry, but that’s exactly the imageries received.)
- Designed to prevent POTUS from CLEANING HOUSE?
- Yup. How can y’all restructure this Americanized Corporation if y’all continue to keep policies that are outmoded?
- Attack on political opponent(s) who is/are actively conducting (leading) investigations into the President for XYZ charges beyond Mueller for XYZ reasons (zero evidence to support) – OBSTRUCTION TRAP?
- Yeah, if that swollen, gout-filled leader continues to attack and criticize the unpaid volunteers who cannot read music, then I’m gonna leave the choir and stop singing hymns of praise and thanksgiving – all for NOTHING! Oops, I meant that if they are abusing and misusing taxpayers monies to do stuff with zero stuff, then I would attack. But if y’all are hungry for the truth, expect traps to be set off. Pow!
- [SDNY] opening ‘private’ investigation for the sole purpose of FINDING A CRIME?
- Yup, that won’t work if the targeted individuals have nothing to do with their problems.
- For example, I know a similar stuff, because I saw public stuff that lead me to believe that crazy and stupid humanz can waste time and money finding nothing, and these liars should be attacked for the very same psychosis that they are PROJECTING onto the innocents. (For those who might know my thoughts or anything public, that’s what I found out.)
- Evidence to support?
- 20190221-2310: Oh, yeah, y’all need whatever evidence y’all can muster and dig up.
- Evidence presented?
- 20190221-2312: If y’all can say something broke, then sometimes that evidence cannot be presented. (Am I getting good with this stuff or what?)
- Does [SDNY] report to AG BARR?
- I would imagine ALL Courts would report to ‘upper management’.
- Watch the news.
- Nope. I watch YouTube videos and listen to what these bloggers have to say.
- [MW] opening *new* investigations into the ‘finances’ of POTUS and/or his family?
- Now, why would someone like her want that same deed done upon her stuff? Perhaps, she would like if taxpayers complained about her expensive stuff. I know, let’s all enforce laws that would compel these public servants and their families to reveal their finances. That’s only fair to the bottom 99%, correct?
- Why did D’s state ‘things will calm down if we retake the House’ prior to the midterm elections?
- Who knows? I barely remember that one. Was it by NP?
- Was their plan to retake the House in order to ‘chair’ each respective committee in order to start *new* erroneous investigations in an attempt to retain the BLOCKADE?
- Sounds like a plan.
- Retain the ‘insurance’ policy?
- 1. 20190221-2207-incoming thought: If the ‘crime’ outweighs the positive end results, then do NOT retain it. For further practical meaning, if y’all cannot afford to keep it and a payout ASAP, then tank it.
- 2. 20190221-2215: If y’all still want leverage, then that is to your advantage. So keep it. Or if y’all can make it disappear, then that’s the end of the story. But if those thingies did exist, I do NOT see how y’all can simply let it go.
- Isn’t that blackmailing?
- Retain the optical illusion that a crime was committed?
- 1. You mean the crime of deception? Yeah, sure. Make them all squirm in their seats. They all deserve to feel heat.)
- 2. Nope. Isn’t that a ‘crime’ in and of itself? Y’all need to deactivate whatever illusion y’all placing on each other and everyone else because that crap is spilling over into my personal arena and I do NOT like it-20180221-2243.
- Retain the narrative?
- Nope. If y’all don’t conclude the narrative by no and preferably prior to 2020, then whatever comes outta that report will effect the 2020 election outcome.
- Retain D_base outrage?
- Nope. That’s kinda getting old and putting a strain on the old farts, especially NP.
- Retain D_base obstruction?
- Nope. That doesn’t make sense as I’m sure the D would NOT want to be replaced by the Libertarian Party.
- Retain D_base support to block POTUS’ agenda?
- Nope. I did NOT ‘feel’ that the D blocked anything outta the ordinary course of business as usual.
- If you know your opponents move, what advantages that does present?
- 1. Nil. Like y’all said, we are one – the good, the bad, the fugly. The fallen ones were once beautiful until they were tempted by the Devil, Lucy, and/or Stan.
- 2. 20190221-2244: Then that gives y’all the opportunity to insert counter-points or counter-active intelligence. (I didn’t know how to spell the order of the last three words.)
- If you have the TRUTH on your side, what advantages does that present?
- 1. Nil. Like y’all said, we are one – we are the TRUTH and there is NO side but TRUTH itself.
- 2. You should NOT fear the TRUTH, no matter how harsh or unreal. (I did NOT like that last word ‘unreal’, because then that word would negate the ‘reality’ or ‘gravity’ of this stuff. But that word seemed to have flowed normally. So I’ll keep it.)
- If you have full control of the US MIL, what advantages does that present?
- 1. Nil. Like y’all said, we are one – we can shoot to kill.
- 2. If they are willing and able to die for a lie, then You hold their lives in the palms of your hands.
- 20190221-2200: An incoming imagery showed the billions of Chinese soldiers marching in unison from my left field of vision to the right field of vision and with their heads turned looking towards my left shoulder. Do y’all hear what I’m trying to say here? If you have full control, then you can use that control to control the narrative, because they serve to clean house and balance out what needs to be [fill in the missing stuff here].)
- 3. 20190221-2226: Y’all can control and ‘take out’ the angry humanz, during The Great Awakening.
- If you have complete AUTH TO DECLAS, what advantages does that present?
- 1. Nil.
- 2. Based on the Twitter comments, y’all owe the taxpayers some sort of reading material, if any. And that stuff can be talked about for novelty’s sake, and entered into the high school books for educational purposes. I would like to know the entire discoveries, which can reveal stuff, by the way. Then again, I really do NOT care what y’all have said behind closed doors. I would rather hear a good joke.
- If you have the SUPPORT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE (PATRIOTS), what advantages does that present?
- 1. Nil.
- 2. At best, we can get a good bear hug and a pat on the back: Job well done! But that’s about it and everyone will go back and about their own personal businesses. Sigh.
- DO NOT TRUST THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA.
- Okay, then I’ll cancel the cable, internet, and phone services and stop trusting anything that does NOT effect my personal stuff.
- YOU ARE THE MAJORITY.
- Yup and so are the billions of Muslims over Jews and Christians combined. I’m just saying.
- MUELLER > DECLAS > OIG > TRUTH > JUSTICE
- I think Mueller will let us know.
- THE GREAT AWAKENING.
- Umm. Yeah, would that include The Second Coming? Or are y’all the one and the same writers? Hmm.
- YOU ARE THE NEWS NOW.
- I think I already knew that after asking for answers many slong years ago and way before this Q stuff cropped up outta nowhere.
- Q
- 20190221-2329-incoming thought indicated tongue sticking outta the oval faced letter ‘O’ [or oh] from music performers, such as Miley C.
20190221-2139. After scanning all questions with my small brain, I would have answered: Nil. These are noted as item number 1.
20190221-2140. I am reading the article: Robert Mueller: 5 Fast Facts You Need To Know
20190221-2141. My nagging thoughts won’t leave me alone! So once again, y’all can never be too careful in reporting stuff publicly. So I will try my best to participate, err, rant, err, opine, provide my incoming thoughts.
20190221-2145. I remembered my nagging thoughts while reading the article about RM. So I am suspecting that rDT is really pushing our red hot and shiny buttons to observe how riled up we can respond to certain environments. And he has presented us with lots of stuff to talk about (I’ve ended/been ending my damn sentence in yet another preposition), such as RP’s hair-do during the 2016 presidential campaign. OMG! rDT is so freaking hilarious. Yes. So hold on, folks while I figure out how to reply properly.
Leave a Reply