I love spreading REAL butter on my toast, pancakes, biscuit, muffin, etc. The sweet variety is especially tasty. After this morning’s mass, the three of us decided to eat breakfast at Carrows (off Tully Road in San Jose, CA). We sat at Table 18 and at 09:05:42 PST received Check #: 332453 from Carlos A., our server. The place was VERY good about refilling the cups of coffee for their customers.
What I noticed towards the bottom of the particular `check` was the convenience of `paying dutch`. For the total amount of $26.37:
“If split among 3 guests, each pay —>8.79.”
Now I was cackling loudly but had to cup my hand over my loud mouth so as not to disturb other meat eaters. Maw understood exactly the concept of `paying dutch`as I described the striking similarity of Obama’s ideologue of `spreading the wealth`. Paw looked on and listened patiently
I compared the following two persons:
Person A: I’m a hungry person and ordered the $8.00 breakfast meal. I’m wealthy and bought another meal at the same price to take home for later on. I have a thyroid problem that makes me hungry. As a matter of fact, my body weight is considered obese and I have diabetes and cardio-vascular problems.
Person B: I’m an anorexic and ordered one cup of coffee for $2.00. I’m poor and did not buy a meal to eat or to take out. As a matter of fact, I refused anymore coffee refills because I didn’t want to add extra weight. I’m so sick of my body image that I cannot hold down a job or hang around people who eat like pigs.
After eating our meal and talking about many things, our handsome waiter handed us our `check`. The `dutch trip` amount came out to be $5.00 per guest. Now Person A has no problem `forking out` [pun intended] her wads of cash and adds a last minute dessert of a hot fudge sundae for $5.00 to the order.
The waiter handed us the adjusted `check` with the total amount of $15.00 (or a split of $7.50 per guest).
Question: Who do you think pays more — Person A (obese and wealthy) or Person B (anorexic and poor)?
Answer: Person B pays more, right? Correct! Person B is not only poor but has to pay taxes out of her paycheck. And in order to feed her skin and bones, she needs to pay even more taxes for food.
But in Obama’s world, Person A pays more than Person B. Why? Because the wealthy has lots of money to spend and therefore these greedy, fat cats shouldn’t have any problem paying higher taxes, too.
Think well, morons. Obama is serving his purpose well. Can you see, now? Neither `spreading the wealth` nor `spreading more butter` benefits the poor, who gets shafted or clogged to death, which ever comes first.
Leave a Reply