So the boy came over for lunch and discussed the issue to the right to `life`. He is against abortion. But there is also the burden of caring for a retarded person. Based on Maw’s experience when working with severely disabled patients, prolonging one’s suffering in a useless body is not good.
Here are my final answers regarding the pro-life or pro-death issues:
- When the person is declared brain dead and lives off a machine, then that person is good to go by the non-insane DOCTOR.
- When the person CAN declare that he/she wishes to LIVE, then that person has the RIGHT to live.
- When the person has no family or relatives to continue life support, then that person is a good to go by the STATE.
- When the mother wishes to abort the child, that is her individual choice. Sorry. It solves the `overpopulation` agenda.
Since technology is available, then anyone can live as long as there is funds available. If the family wishes to continue life support on a brain dead person, then the family must be the ones to pay and not the insurance companies or states.
We are our own `Gods`. Life and death can be decided.
Consider this: How would you like to continue reviving a zombie? That is not a good picture, right? Therefore, allow the spirit to be free from the fleshy bodies of mostly carbon and bags of mostly water. Stop thinking of `death` as a bad thing because the soul is eternal.
Leave a Reply