http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/12/19/us/gun-plans-dont-conflict-with-justices-08-ruling.xml
“The courts have upheld federal laws banning gun ownership by people convicted of felonies and some misdemeanors, by illegal immigrants and by drug addicts. They have upheld laws making it illegal to carry guns near schools or in post offices. They have upheld laws concerning unregistered weapons. And they have upheld laws banning machine guns and sawed-off shotguns.”
Oh, oops! The above/third paragraph makes sense. I assumed there would have been more gun control laws leading to completely disarming the American citizens.
“The proposed measures include bans on some kinds of weapons and ammunition magazines, more information sharing among government agencies and an expansion of the settings in which background checks are required.”
Hah! I knew it. The lockdown (the analogous slow boiling of a frog until it dies) towards martial law and leading to communism is on the horizon. Why don’t you audit/do back ground checks on politicians/government employess and find out if they are doing their jobs correctly?
Could “some kinds of [dangerous and unusual kinds of] weapons” include Dr. Evil’s “lasers” or blue-beams? How about chemical/bio-weaponry, old man/dog skunky fart/belches/burps, bamboo sticks/river stones/crystal rocks/D&D swords/elvishs arrows/bows, huh?
Boring. Yawn.
Posted from WordPress for Android
Leave a Reply