Tag: politics

Once again, my messages fail to go through the thickest of skulls, which are mostly senior citizens who think they know how TPTB operate or what their small brains take everything that was ever said and done as being `face value`.

I noticed that Barack Obama uses lots of reference in the first person during his speeches. Certain people, namely Maw, thinks he is just speaking for himself and not for the country. He gives off the appearance of sounding arrogant, which is true. I too detest arrogance. The energy is too heavy and quite yucky to sense.

But, I hear something else, something familiar, not double speak but he is using a `reverse` technique. At `face value` Obama sounds like is full of crap and doesn’t know what he is talking about, which is true because no one could give specifics to details or know everything on his plate.

[Damn! That’s a bad analogy because anyone with food on his or her plate should KNOW what is on it in the first place, right?]

Anyway, by using lots `I` in his speech and if one was to listen carefully how he says or phrases his words, it’s really all about mind-programming.

Later on that evening, we watched on C-SPAN a speech in its entirety made by Obama at the University of New Orleans. I don’t remember what he said but he kept using himself as an example many times. People in the back were making stern faces or laughing. And there was little excitement and less clapping in support of his lies, too.

What I noticed is that if people with very suggestible minds were to hear his speeches, the proactive verbs used by Obama in the first person could be `transferred` to the intended listener: I can do this. I can do that. I can do everything. And so can you! All of it is supposed to be positive, no matter how dire the economic recession appears at `face value`. But we all know that politicians are liars.

I noticed that being negative would bring down the energy level of the planet. So that’s my take on why Obama speaks in public the way he does: Anti-Christ or not, reverse speech or not, he is trying to teach people to stop drooling or worshiping any entity but God, who won’t like that in people who have within themselves to improve, not by changes from outside(rs).

I didn’t get to watch the entire speeches of President Barack Obama of the United States of America, of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi and of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

I do NOT care what the critics of their times have to say about what, in my humble but personal opinion is that: Their words still hold truth! If only the super-powers behind the scenes would stop their various forms of slavery, I wouldn’t be ranting right now.

Again, I’m getting a general feeling that a global responsibility by each nation and accountability of each citizen are needed. The terrors are NOT entirely the people of Muslim faith or of those from nations not considered Westernized or of anyone living in uncivilized societies.

For there is no such thing as a one-way street, where people are divorced from each other and no love exists. There is a two-way street, where information can be exchanged without the exchange of nuclear arms.

The level of understanding by their critics are VERY limited and ONE-SIDED. Again, they serve but I can NOT quite place my simple mind on their purpose for exposing the global corruption being played out right before our eyes.

I am particularly NOT pleased for the walk-out when President Ahmdinejad was speaking. This shows BLANTANT disrespect for someone who is trying to even out the playing field. I am NOT pleased to hear the Iranians labeling him as a devil, which reminds me of what Hugo Chavez once called the then President George W. Bush.

I am, however, impressed with Gadhafi’s data gathering of how bio-pharmaceuticals HAVE made a business by profiting from manufactured viruses and vaccinations. Then he threw a small piece of paper from which he read that information up into the chairpersons sitting above the podium.